From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 22:15:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652CC1065672; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84258FC0C; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahl5 with SMTP id l5so58968lah.13 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:15:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=NLfrv9QLDtMXZlqw9P98sdi+9lH4wNmuD8Rskwa1VPg=; b=pRlyDVS9MKSzIBs729bgwG0yULqcP23z6xwzwr5s6O7zLV+RRE9xgi/8iJIonbiYqS Jh4CAcHn/E3Pxdi8w2E+B01uTY/9JhNMiueVejcAbwnYADtz/9kJSkqaipTYjQMeY3DM kIF3sJt1dYm3dC5sU8hvy2PqC9wmebW34fbt8= Received: by 10.112.103.131 with SMTP id fw3mr4656196lbb.78.1326233712241; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:15:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.129.8 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:14:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F0CB53A.40703@freebsd.org> References: <13699828.11899591326204599393.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> <4F0CB53A.40703@freebsd.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:14:41 -0500 Message-ID: To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Barbara , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: repocopying games/linux-enemyterritory-jaymod X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:15:14 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > lets start by opening a PR for each port, offering to take maintainership. > > (edit-pr.. I think the class is 'change-request') send-pr or the web form > once you are approved as maintainer, you would then ask a committer to set > class for repocopy. status not class > and, maybe you can just set class as repocopy in the initial pr. nope > include patches against the COPY in your PR copy should be identical > GNATS will auto assign it to portmgr, who will make the copy (which > preserves the cvs history), > once copy is made, it will be re-assigned back to the pool, or a committer > who will commit your changes. The committer who asked for the repo copy gets it, it does not go back to the pool. Do not submit a repocopy you don't intend to deal with (I learned this lesson some time ago). -- Eitan Adler