From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 1 02:28:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C61106566C for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 02:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net) Received: from mail.mgwigglesworth.net (mail.mgwigglesworth.com [75.146.26.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCCC8FC12 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 02:28:02 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:27:44 -0500 Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D1E061E.9070306@mgwigglesworth.net> <4D1E68BA.9080001@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D1E74B5.8030100@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D1E78D9.6090103@mgwigglesworth.net> <4D1E7BDA.3080909@mgwigglesworth.net> <4D1E7D8C.7060606@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Message-ID: <4D1E9120.1070604@mgwigglesworth.net> From: "Martes G Wigglesworth" Received: from devsecure.mgwigglesworth.net (192.168.5.10 [192.168.5.10]) by mail.mgwigglesworth.net; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:24:03 -0500 Organization: M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How can I implement true vps with FreeBSD as a host? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 02:28:03 -0000 On 12/31/2010 08:04 PM, Da Rock wrote: > Depends on what you mean by 'fair'. I think you can now determine CPU > usage in jails, even allocate cores. I think the man pages can tell > you more about that, and the docs on freebsd.org. You can unmask some > devices within the jail and allow only certain jails and users to > access it. And finally I think you can jail a jail now, so that might > be useful- especially in CPU allocation. I was thinking about possible DoS issues with memory management, however, I have not read far enough into the Jails docs to find out if there is anything new in this arena. I was actually considering the security aspects of memory overflows, etc.... -- Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC www.mgwigglesworth.net