Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:23:38 -0400 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> To: "Magnus Ringman" <bmr@google.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What do you think ?: How should pseundo terminals behave ... Message-ID: <FD2DE6EA-3397-444B-B398-3269C6DDFD8B@ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <4f674ca50609261121v5ed0b2dalad3607634c965271@mail.google.com> References: <20060926111452.J91466@godot.imp.ch> <0C4B0125-11AA-4BDB-A4E3-163A6194AB68@alumni.cwru.edu> <98FD6058-7220-48DB-AC24-F989FCB2AE11@ece.cmu.edu> <4f674ca50609261029s76432971yfc15171a3e89cb72@mail.google.com> <8EECEF0C-8C94-4A7C-862A-633F67D3D229@ece.cmu.edu> <4f674ca50609261109s78a26d3dh1dd0a6dc8c112ca2@mail.google.com> <F0E30165-89B1-4A79-A376-615AF1655234@ece.cmu.edu> <4f674ca50609261121v5ed0b2dalad3607634c965271@mail.google.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 26, 2006, at 14:21 , Magnus Ringman wrote: > Ah, yes - my bad. We agree! > My poor brain stem objected to the use of SIGHUP for losing master, on > grounds that a hangup is a perfetly valid terminal event. > Invalidating the fd is the important point. Yeh, I was unclear: I said "hangup", intending not SIGHUP but vhangup () (but recalling that freebsd doesn't do vhangup() so not calling it such). -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FD2DE6EA-3397-444B-B398-3269C6DDFD8B>