From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec  1 14:34:00 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE3F129
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Dec 2012 14:34:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from fernando@gont.com.ar)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [93.186.182.34])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E498FC12
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Dec 2012 14:33:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 187-135-17-190.fibertel.com.ar ([190.17.135.187]
 helo=[192.168.1.113])
 by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256)
 (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <fernando@gont.com.ar>)
 id 1Teo8E-0004Mi-AU; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 15:33:26 +0100
Message-ID: <50BA14C3.4070601@gont.com.ar>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 11:31:31 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Keith Arner <vornum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with ephemeral port selection
References: <CAEo_tUH9LPzPFP-O=317rYEQ3nT66b4biQshV_8=L8hReO_BLg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEo_tUH9LPzPFP-O=317rYEQ3nT66b4biQshV_8=L8hReO_BLg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:34:00 -0000

Hi, Keith,

On 11/30/2012 11:09 AM, Keith Arner wrote:
>
>  - behave uniformly whether or not SO_REUSEADDR has been set
>  - allow outgoing connection requests to re-use a local port number, so
>    long as the remaining elements of the tuple (laddr, fport, faddr) are
>    unique

Please take a look at the discussion on how to "steal" incomming
connections in Section 3.1 of RFC 6056.

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1