From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 14 09:19:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363B116A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.vincentjardin.net
	(AVelizy-102-1-2-230.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.206.230])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385AF43FA3
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:18:58 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jardin@venus.vincentjardin.net)
Received: from venus.vincentjardin.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	hAEHKf9A012645;	Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:20:41 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jardin@venus.vincentjardin.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by venus.vincentjardin.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAEHKeJM012644;
	Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:20:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@free.fr>
To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:20:40 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <20031114163837.GA64140@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20031114163837.GA64140@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200311141820.40593.vjardin@free.fr>
Subject: Re: ng_nat vs natd vs ipnat?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:19:00 -0000

Sorry I did not. So maybe I should not answer.

By the way, I think that a ng_nat would have quite the same perfomance than 
ipnat. Moreover I think that many ng_nat_xxx would be required in order to 
support the ALGs:
  - ng_nat_ftp
  - ng_nat_sip
  - ng_nat_h323
  - ...

ng_nat would be only the core of the NAT service.

Vincent

On Friday 14 November 2003 17:38, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Has anyone implemented NAT as a Netgraph node?
> If so, how does performance compare to natd and ipnat?
>
> Regards,
> BMS
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"