From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 15:49:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687BD1065674 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (cl-555.hel-01.fi.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:100:22a::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9F68FC29 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.8] (helo=ping.int.athame.co.uk) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KVpvq-000AHm-8m; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:49:10 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett To: kde-freebsd@kde.org Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:49:42 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.0 (FreeBSD/7.0-STABLE; KDE/4.1.0; amd64; ; ) References: <200808141338.18204.Fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru> In-Reply-To: <200808141338.18204.Fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808201849.43465.andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: Dima Panov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] devel/kdesdk3 fail if textproc/flex is installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:49:26 -0000 On Thursday 14 August 2008 05:38:16 Dima Panov wrote: > Hello! > > > devel/kdesdk3 fail if textproc/flex is installed, because > textproc/flex conflicting with system flex, and have ABI > incompatibility. > > To flex maintiner: ${PREFIX}/include is not good place for confliting > header file, FlexLexer.h. Move it into subdirectory instead and teach > ports, which really need this version, to use new version.. Dima, has this been PR'd against textproc/flex? We (kde@) know about the kdesdk3 case (ports/115912), but I'd prefer to see flex port fixed as you suggested. It's just plain wrong. Andy -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org