Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 09 Sep 1995 13:41:33 -0700
From:      David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
To:        John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za>
Cc:        archive@cps.cmich.edu (Mail Archive), freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sig 11 
Message-ID:  <199509092041.NAA00255@corbin.Root.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 09 Sep 95 22:19:11 %2B0200." <199509092019.WAA18054@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> 
>> On Sat, 9 Sep 1995, John Capo wrote:
>> 
>> > Mail Archive writes:
>> > > 
>> > > On Sat, 9 Sep 1995, David Greenman wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > > ...
>> > > > >pid 123: sed: uid 8: exited on signal 11
>> > > > >pid 126: sed: uid 8: exited on signal 11
>> > 
>> > These kinds of problems are all part of running -current.  Current
>> > is a development tree and is quite often broken for one reason or
>> > another.  Like the docs say, "The bleeding edge".
>> > 
>> > Sounds like you should be running -stable rather than -current.
>> I have been compiling -stable for the last 4 hours it just finished 
>> rebooted and got the EXACT same thing...
>> 
>> You explain why it doesn't matter....
>> 
>Did you recompile the kernel also when you went to -stable? Because I think
>that the problem may be in the kernel. In any case I don't think a -current
>kernel will work well with -stable user level programs.

   No, it won't...in fact, doing that will have all sorts of strange and
unpredictable consequences. 2.1 system binaries and kernel are not compatible
with 2.2 system binaries and kernel - you can't mix them successfully.
   Is that what you're doing???

-DG



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509092041.NAA00255>