From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 9 18:42:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A341116A4CE for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:42:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 768E543D41 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:42:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: (qmail 16701 invoked by uid 113); 9 Oct 2004 11:42:30 -0700 Received: from 64.62.253.84 by beer.ux6.net (envelope-from , uid 112) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:0(64.62.253.84):SA:0(0.0/6.0):. Processed in 5.594298 secs); 09 Oct 2004 18:42:30 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 Received: from unknown (HELO miha.netstream-gh.com) (miha@beer.ux6.net@64.62.253.84) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Oct 2004 11:42:24 -0700 From: "Mikhail P." To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:43:06 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410081937.15068.miha@ghuug.org> <41682D3F.4060902@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <41682D3F.4060902@DeepCore.dk> Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410091843.06854.miha@ghuug.org> cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Subject: Re: ad0: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 18:42:30 -0000 On Saturday 09 October 2004 18:26, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote: > Hmm, that means that the drive couldn't find the sector you asked for. > Now, what has me wondering is that it is the exact sector where we > switch to 48bit adressing mode. Anyhow, I've just checked on the old > Maxtor preproduktion 48bit reference drive I have here and it crosses > the limit with no problems. > What controller are you using ? not all supports 48bit mode correctly.. There's VIA's motherboard (not sure about the model name). Here's info regarding ata controller from dmesg: atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac0f at device 17.1 on= =20 pci0 I will be able to test the drives (the ones which I thought of as "failed")= on=20 another board within 10 days or so. regards, M.