From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 18:57:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AEC16A401 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 18:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671B213C46E for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 18:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C502F2091; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:57:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4680E2090; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:57:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 312A4A10AC; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:57:22 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Gergely CZUCZY References: <20070408140215.GA54201@harmless.hu> <86k5wmu420.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070408181916.GA59715@harmless.hu> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:57:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070408181916.GA59715@harmless.hu> (Gergely CZUCZY's message of "Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:19:16 +0200") Message-ID: <86bqhyu225.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: volume management X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:57:26 -0000 Gergely CZUCZY writes: > yeap, i know about ZFS, as i assume, it will need around 1.5-2 years > from now, when 7.0-RELEASE will be ready. No, it's expected this fall. > and i'm looking for a solution for a production environment within > a year. There is no other solution. > on-the-fly growfs is not required. stopping the service for a few > minutes can be done, since we've got enough redundancy in our > server farm. > and UFS2 has growfs(8), that would be enough. I suspect growfs(8) may take more than a few minutes... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no