From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 28 14:00:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C1A1065672 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=757fb544d=mmp@actinet.cz) Received: from lanternfish.actinet.cz (lanternfish.actinet.cz [194.228.107.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9954B8FC13 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:00:17 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: s=praha; d=actinet.cz; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To: Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority: X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=btUVHa7fcZW46a9qywJZ+Ysinvw208CvpoOaCm83Z/8JBl+qo887JfOG W/H4ZPBE4Vrt3Qrd1wGgJzPLW1eMKh49/VH5GBgW7y3oNJC/sCYn5i7DE N64Bwf6q/wGcOIhzgiQ24NW0/E0gFnrh7fMwWpwB/7uLyfLbMxXA6mnyB g=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,318,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="1410803" Received: from dolphin.actinet.cz ([194.228.107.130]) by lanternfish.actinet.cz with ESMTP; 28 May 2010 15:39:39 +0200 Received: from mpdomain (unknown [192.168.3.254]) by dolphin.actinet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC037CA0D for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 15:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: From: =?iso-8859-2?B?TWlsb/IgUGFwZb7taw==?= To: Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:39:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18197 Subject: javavmwrapper - JVM order question X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:00:18 -0000 Hi, I have problem/question regarding the order of JVMs determined by javavmwrapper when no JAVA* environment variables are set. When I do not have installed ports, the javavmwrapper determines the JVM according to /usr/local/etc/javavms. However when the ports are installed, the order is determined according to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk. The problem is that each scenario gives different result. I would expect the javavmwrapper to be consistent - to use always /usr/local/etc/javavms and use bsd.java.mk as fallback when /usr/local/etc/javavms is not available. Should we change/fix javavmwrapper? What do you think? Thank you in advance, Milon -- mmp@actinet.cz