From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jun 24 10:13:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from arnold.neland.dk (mail.neland.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92B614F57 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:13:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.0.14]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA28509 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:13:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <00c901bebe64$f5267d60$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> From: "Leif Neland" To: Subject: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:13:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I just wonder, when holding mail for a domain, which picks it up by dialin and doing smtp/etrn, one almost is forced to issue static ip's. Why not use uucp? Is it just considered old-fashioned, nobody understands how to set it up, or are there heavy reasons not to use uucp? Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message