From owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 07:01:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C0D16A4CE; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261BD43D54; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0V6xcXM082397; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:59:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:01:15 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com> To: scottl@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org> References: <20050130130011.A9B0D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org cc: tinderbox@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Tinderbox reports, responses, and meta-comments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:00 -0000 In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org> Scott Long writes: : Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64? Most likely historical inertia... No body noticed until that module build got more facist. Warner