From owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 31 07:01:00 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A9C0D16A4CE; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 261BD43D54; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0V6xcXM082397;
	Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:59:38 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:01:15 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20050131.000115.04191271.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: scottl@FreeBSD.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
References: <20050130130011.A9B0D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.org
cc: tinderbox@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tinderbox reports, responses, and meta-comments
	<freebsd-tinderbox.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-tinderbox>,
	<mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-tinderbox>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-tinderbox>,
	<mailto:freebsd-tinderbox-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:01:00 -0000

In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
            Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?

Most likely historical inertia...  No body noticed until that module
build got more facist.

Warner