From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 11 22:40:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170DC16A420 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A066B43D45 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1BMeBjq016492 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1BMeBUL016491; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:40:11 GMT Message-Id: <200602112240.k1BMeBUL016491@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93205: [new port] net/tcpxtract X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:40:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/93205; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93205: [new port] net/tcpxtract Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:34:32 +0100 Oh.... It was the sample entry on the PortRequest website. This port already exists. I buttered the butterbread. :) It's getting late here... This can be closed. Gabor Kovesdan