From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Apr  9 17:42: 2 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE65115037
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 1999 17:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk)
Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (ident=ben)
	by scientia.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 2.12 #4)
	id 10Vl4l-000EDN-00; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:52:43 +0100
	(envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:52:43 +0100
From: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk>
To: Jake Ott <jott@frii.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Y2K...
Message-ID: <19990410005243.D52130@scientia.demon.co.uk>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904091514510.11939-100000@elara.frii.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904091514510.11939-100000@elara.frii.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Jake Ott wrote:

> Anyone checked out 'vi' for y2k?

I think the entire FreeBSD tree is being checked. More information is
available at

	http://www.freebsd.org/~danny/

As for vi, are you just curious, or have you noticed a potential problem?

-- 
Ben Smithurst
ben@scientia.demon.co.uk


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message