From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 14 03:43:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA00919 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 03:43:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from Post-Office.UH.EDU (Post-Office.UH.EDU [129.7.1.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA00912 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 03:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU by Post-Office.UH.EDU (PMDF V5.0-6 #8380) id <01I2BFDRA16S00066P@Post-Office.UH.EDU>; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 05:14:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA07479 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 14 Mar 1996 04:46:18 -0600 Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id EAA06203; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 04:37:03 -0600 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 04:37:03 -0600 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: News group split time? In-reply-to: <20953.824755000@time.cdrom.com> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@freebsd.org Message-id: <199603141037.EAA06203@bonkers.taronga.com> Organization: none Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Newsgroups: taronga.freebsd.hackers References: <199602191809.LAA13038@phaeton.artisoft.com> Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >That's not the issue. The newsgroup was named by the infamous USENET >cabal, Was not. If anyone's a member of the cabal *I* am, and I opposed this name. The name decision was pretty much the work of a couple of people in the UVV. In any case, the bofh.cabal group is where this should be discussed.