From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Mar 19 03:39:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA17443 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 03:39:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from bagpuss.visint.co.uk (bagpuss.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA17437 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 03:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from bagpuss.visint.co.uk (bagpuss.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.1]) by bagpuss.visint.co.uk (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA12757; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 11:39:59 GMT Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1997 11:39:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: C.R.Harding@massey.ac.nz cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speaking of PR In-Reply-To: <199703172212.OAA07938@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 18 Mar 1997 C.R.Harding@massey.ac.nz wrote: > * LINUX TO FLY ON STS-83 * > ========================== > The Linux operating system will again ride into space in support of a > > > company is used in their place. The entire system uses only 10 > watts". The primary role of Linux in the hydroponics experiment on > Doesn't Linux run cooler than FreeBSD though, it even says so somewhere in the docs.. (no I don't know where) about how Linux uses HALT.. So obviously if someone wants FreeBSD used on a space shuttle mission then this minimal power drain thing is important.. Although I don't know why this wasn't done on an ARM chip of some sort, if power was important.. oh blah blah.. Steve.