Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:23:53 -0600 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132035: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT Message-ID: <1235669033.1289.4.camel@widget.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <86iqmxo5kh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <200902240100.n1O10L0h095606@freefall.freebsd.org> <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net> <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com> <1235452157.1273.10.camel@widget.2hip.net> <86iqmxo5kh.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:28 +0300, Anonymous wrote: > Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 06:31 +0300, Anonymous wrote: > >> Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >> > >> > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 01:00 +0000, edwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> >> Synopsis: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT > >> >> > >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 > >> >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > >> >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 24 01:00:20 UTC 2009 > >> >> Responsible-Changed-Why: > >> >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) > >> > > >> > Why do you want a slave port? That is just going to complicate things. > >> > >> Things are already complicated enough that distfile for libdrm-2.4.5 > >> doesn't include > >> > >> libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h > >> libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_private.h > >> > >> As airlied explained on #dri-devel I guess it was itentional to force > >> users to only use version from git. > >> > >> > I don't see any reason not to install the various libdrm interfaces > >> > right now. > >> > >> As I understand nouveau interface is not stable. It may go away to a > >> separate branch one day. If that happens I would not need to touch > >> libdrm port, only convert libdrm-nouveau from slave port to a normal one > >> with snapshot as distfile and switch xf86-video-nouveau to statically > >> link with libdrm_nouveau.a. > > > > Lets wait and deal with it when that time comes... I will at least have > > a say in what happens there. Once we have something resembling working > > nouveau drm code it may become more relevant, but I don't want to go > > down this path right now if we don't have to. > > Looks like I misunderstood. Those files are now part of distfile > generating target. So, I don't mind dropping slave port idea. > > How about attached patch? Now that libdrm port was updated to 2.4.5 > xf86-video-nouveau is broken. It needs an update, too. This looks ok, but let me see whats going on with the nouveau folk. Maybe we can just cut a point release since this is fixed in git already. robert. -- Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmm0CkACgkQM4TrQ4qfRONb7QCgg4VY/q5knPAOMDTyQALXETzj XJ4Ani6e/QbSLhKAnwwHkENGksYOxJe7 =fOt1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1235669033.1289.4.camel>