Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:09:21 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Asus A8V IRQ/serial problems Message-ID: <200606231509.29720.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20060622.230433.24902227.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200606221424.14380.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060622.230433.24902227.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1284354.uDnmJJ3PFh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 23 June 2006 14:34, M. Warner Losh wrote: > isa_irq_pending can only really be called on isa bus attachments... > > Why don't you have ISA in your kernel. I thought it was still required. It's not in GENERIC on 6.1. atpic has isa_irq_pending, however if you don't have atpic in your kernel a= =20 stub is built in machdep.c. =2E. although that only happens if DEV_ISA is defined.. I don't understand how=20 sio.c can link if you don't have isa in your kernel because there won't be= =20 any isa_irq_pending() defined anywhere. WTF? =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1284354.uDnmJJ3PFh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEm36R5ZPcIHs/zowRAnTqAJ9/1s/X7Qf+B075qUITG4IOuO6gXQCfQqk7 Ay8SeFNsXKoCIeyDHKk/9HI= =ccvL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1284354.uDnmJJ3PFh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606231509.29720.doconnor>