From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jun 30 22:20: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6585914C03 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:20:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA21579; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199907010520.WAA21579@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Jason C. Wells" Subject: Re: ports/12463: Update: Fvwm2 to 2.2.2 Reply-To: "Jason C. Wells" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/12463; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Jason C. Wells" To: Tim Vanderhoek Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12463: Update: Fvwm2 to 2.2.2 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:15:21 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, 1 Jul 1999, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: >How would you feel about removing the unnecessary article "A". > >ie. > >"Popular virtual window manager for XWindows" > >The "A " seems to add very little to the comment. > >[Answer with either a "good idea" or "bad idea" type answer, please, not "I >don't care" --- I'm trying to decide whether its good idea or not to >run a script through all the pkg/COMMENTs removing useless articles]. I don't care. Thank You, | "Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither Jason Wells | freedom nor security." - Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message