From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 19 4:18:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A8137B400 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 04:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [193.124.215.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2133343E5E for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 04:18:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from drweb by mail.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17VViw-0004uD-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:15:02 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mail.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17VViv-0004ty-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:15:01 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6JBEvqJ096490; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:14:57 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g6JBEOXP096435; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:14:24 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:14:23 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Terry Lambert Cc: Luigi Rizzo , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: proposed changes to kern_switch.c and kern_synch.c Message-ID: <20020719181423.A87152@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20020716235216.B6785@iguana.icir.org> <3D351B99.311431F@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D351B99.311431F@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:24:09AM -0700 X-Envelope-To: tlambert2@mindspring.com, rizzo@icir.org, arch@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:24:09AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > Hi, > > we have implemented a weight-based process scheduler > > for FreeBSD-stable, and are trying to port it to -current (in the > > description below replace "process" with "thread/kse" as appropriate > > for the -current case). > > Are you going to make this new scheduler generally available? > > What is the weighting? > > Is it weighted fair share? And how does it compare to what we have now? ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message