From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jul 25  9:21:56 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDE237B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E02E43E4A
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp@polstra.com)
Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13])
	by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g6PGLkD17730;
	Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp@vashon.polstra.com)
Received: (from jdp@localhost)
	by vashon.polstra.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g6PGLkBg033883;
	Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jdp)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200207251621.g6PGLkBg033883@vashon.polstra.com>
To: current@freebsd.org
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Cc: des@ofug.org
Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure
In-Reply-To: <xzp3cu7ok71.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References: <200207241200.g6OC0dJJ005500@bowie.private> <20020724101904.D201@espresso.q9media.com> <200207241542.g6OFgC9b032281@vashon.polstra.com> <xzp3cu7ok71.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In article <xzp3cu7ok71.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav  <des@ofug.org> wrote:
> John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> writes:
> > Does tinderbox run with a nonstandard WARNS setting?  I did the
> > cross build with these environment settings:
> 
> des@freefall ~% cat tinderbox/make.conf
> CFLAGS           = -O -pipe
> COPTFLAGS        = -O -pipe
> NOPROFILE        = true
> MAKE_KERBEROS4   = yes
> MAKE_KERBEROS5   = yes
> 
> and the relevant bits of tinderbox.sh:
> 
> /bin/mkdir -p "${obj}"
> MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX="${obj}"; export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX
> __MAKE_CONF="${base}/make.conf"; export __MAKE_CONF
>     /usr/bin/make -s buildworld
> for kc in ${kernels} ; do
>     (cd sys/${arch}/conf && make ${kc})
>     /usr/bin/make -s buildkernel KERNCONF=${kc} -DNO_WERROR
> done

Now I'm really confused.  If the script is passing -DNO_WERROR to
the buildkernel invocation then why did a warning kill the build?

John
-- 
  John Polstra
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Chögyam Trungpa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message