Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:39:33 -0500
From:      Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net>
To:        Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports/36254: Conflicting function definition with standard libraries
Message-ID:  <20020324203933.GB64705@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
In-Reply-To: <200203241620.g2OGK3X69485@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200203241620.g2OGK3X69485@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 08:20:03AM -0800, Miguel Mendez wrote:
>The following reply was made to PR ports/36254; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> Unfortunately, that will break compilation of the port on older systems,
> where that function it's not part of libc. My humble suggestion:
> 
> Then, patch the source code and surround that function with and #ifdef
> NEED_STRNSTR

Nope. 

1. Internal libwww should not be built, so no need to patch. 

2. If it were being used, function doesn't match system function, so can't
remove, must rename and patch all calls to it that fail.

-- 
AlanE
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." - HST


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020324203933.GB64705>