From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 9 2:40: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D635437B404 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 02:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 7A20DAE147; Thu, 9 May 2002 02:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 02:39:58 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Mark Murray Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Resolution (Was: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD) Message-ID: <20020509093958.GA36741@elvis.mu.org> References: <200205072241.g47Mf0jV002339@grimreaper.grondar.org> <200205090931.g499VgjV094375@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200205090931.g499VgjV094375@grimreaper.grondar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Mark Murray [020509 02:35] wrote: > > So it looks like FreeBSD gets to ditch perl from the OS. I will do this. Woohoo! > There are some issues to deal with. > > 1) There are some perl scripts in the base OS that need to be either > ditched or rewritten. Yes. > 2) The exact method of providing perl to the user base needs to be > rounded off. Here are some suggestions for this: > a) Rely entirely on the port and leave it at that. > b) Install the port at install time in a similar way to the > way we currently install XFree86. > c) Install a wrapper in /usr/bin/perl that runs the real > perl from whereever it is. b makes the most sense as long as it's optional. > 3) Fix the ports system such that USE_PERL makes an appropriate > dependancy on the perl port, and does not assume perl in the > base OS. > 4) Fix ports that do things like "perl -spi -e '