From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 30 00:15:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4729910656C1 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B598FC1B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8U0F1Tt044797; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:15:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n8U0F1MP044794; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:15:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:15:00 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: RW In-Reply-To: <20090929120406.269d3505@gumby.homeunix.com> Message-ID: References: <20090928011444.29110022@chris.makeworld.com> <20090928213703.ecf59a9d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090929022231.9a92783f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090929023233.69b37187@gumby.homeunix.com> <20090929120406.269d3505@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:15:01 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk Cloning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:15:03 -0000 On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, RW wrote: > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:08:43 -0600 (MDT) > Warren Block wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, RW wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:22:31 +0200 >>> Polytropon wrote: >>> >>>> doing 1:1 copies with dd is always possible and will >>>> keep content identically; remember to copy the MBR separately >>>> with bs=512 and count=1 from the /dev/ad{source} device. >>> >>> Why? >> >> Because it contains the partition table. > > Right, but why separately, rather than with the rest of the disk? For me, it would be because dealing with an individual 512-byte partition table file is easier than decompressing a multi-gigabyte image file to get at the first 512 bytes. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA