From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 1 20:38:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4C4106564A for ; Fri, 1 May 2009 20:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outE.internet-mail-service.net (oute.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B83F8FC12 for ; Fri, 1 May 2009 20:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1979DE4BD6; Fri, 1 May 2009 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8732D6180; Fri, 1 May 2009 13:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49FB5DB3.9030200@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 13:38:11 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Mallon References: <49F4070C.2000108@gmx.de> <20090428114754.GB89235@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20090430.090226.1569754707.imp@bsdimp.com> <49FA8D73.6040207@gmx.de> <49FAB322.9030103@elischer.org> <5f67a8c40905011324s2ad5e02dy47c73ae950845b54@mail.gmail.com> <49FB5C57.6050407@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <49FB5C57.6050407@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Zaphod Beeblebrox Subject: Re: C99: Suggestions for style(9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 20:38:14 -0000 Christoph Mallon wrote: > > You are mistaken. Re-read the "if": It already contains a "return;" as > then-part. The declaration of "bp" has no relation to the "if". > In fact this is very good: "bp" can only be used after the "if", because > it is declared after it. Further, it most probably is only assigned a > value once, so declaration and the signle assignment are in the same > place, which aids readability and makes the code more concise. the fact that people misread it allows me to say "the defense rests m'lord" > > Christoph > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"