Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 23:56:37 +0530 From: "Kamal R. Prasad" <kamalp@kprasad.org> To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Subject: Re: ps command Message-ID: <417167DD.2010101@kprasad.org> In-Reply-To: <20041015021636.GA65967@VARK.MIT.EDU> References: <416EA82F.6060102@kprasad.org> <p0611042abd9463cf9290@[128.113.24.47]> <416F28F9.107@kprasad.org> <20041015021636.GA65967@VARK.MIT.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz wrote: >On Fri, Oct 15, 2004, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: > > >>Alright. It looks like you are taking care of it. Are there any other >>commands/utilities that need significant work for posix compliance? >> >> > >Yes, there's a list at > > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > >It isn't up-to-date, but it should give you a pretty good idea of >what needs to be done. > > I see one to-do to make code thread-safe. Im not sure and would like someone to elaborate on that. Besides that, I am looking for some generic to-do stuff inside the kernel [or at most libc] but doesn't require special hardware. . thanks -kamal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?417167DD.2010101>