From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 20:26:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C527E106564A for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fred.morcos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC8C8FC14 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so6021664yhg.13 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HXPbcQRODemvfs7taPXSCgqt+kCMkdXUcIDFiUAzG1Y=; b=kpfbNsx2t/HrloPTALgMHz8R0zHgklVl2g8Kmk0sW+b5jl6MPRXp/GU61EZV4SPrO/ Z8R4hZVbo3Mvl82Tn02IkhD9gRZ3XZ54QMZZxmG33nNDT9fv4uZeRpiPxAxn1QT6TVzU e0OXS7zb8Of1WkQ/ZN53sfDrON6Dp0d6Ui+Z9GhRV5Fw4kkBbVIxm9PSxDsjNs1+Xh/n YUP8shQcg6R9I6JPfK4ZhUh10CHBUpM6O3Rbmsffm8hSCimg0MPsRe7D7VXpS9I5k0Sk dQBSlLUjWFcUMhrFNJx6zkTMsi4+3QjD8ZXKqs7xqmg/b24ewmOILOgrjeY9y1CpWJj1 5tCA== Received: by 10.60.21.234 with SMTP id y10mr21201385oee.0.1340137606945; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:26:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.241.7 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:26:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> References: <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> From: Fred Morcos Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:26:26 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:26:47 -0000 I don't see much fruit coming out of that conversation anymore. On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote: > >> GPL protects the freedom of the programmer who licensed his >> code under those licenses: He wants it to be free for use, >> but not to be turned into closed source products. > > What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called > "forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open > your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball... > >> A programmer who does not want to raise this barrier will >> typically use the BSD license which is "more free". > > No, it's just plain "free." > >> BSDL in opposite is often criticized a "rape me license". > > No, it is not, except perhaps by lying atheist Marxist bastards and his > religious adherents. > >> It explicitely (!) allows creating derivates in a closed >> source manner. This means that parts of BSD licensed code >> can be a key component in a proprietary closed source >> product that is for sale (e. g. a firewall appliance), >> and nobody will find out about that fact. > > Now you got it! GPL is about forcing people to do what /you/ want and BSD is > about letting them do what /they/ want. Let's see if you can guess which one > of those licenses is about freedom. Hint: freedom is not defined as forcing > people to do what you want. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"