Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:56:16 -0500 From: "Wall, Stephen" <swall@redcom.com> To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: openssl DIST_SUBDIR change Message-ID: <401084E5E73F4241A44F3C9E6FD79428A0A9F6EC@exch-01>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is the recent name change in the openssl port's DIST_SUBDIR intentional, or=
a leftover from some intermediate test stage of the port? Seems like an o=
dd change to make on purpose...
> DIST_SUBDIR=3D ${DISTNAME}2
Also, FYI for anyone who cares, the OpenSSL project has released a security=
update, version 1.0.1d.
See http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-announce@openssl.org/msg00124.html =
for details.
--=20
Stephen P. Wall
Stephen_Wall@redcom.com
(585) 924-7550
REDCOM Laboratories, Inc.
One Redcom Center
Victor, NY 14564 USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?401084E5E73F4241A44F3C9E6FD79428A0A9F6EC>