From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan  8 09:56:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA20229
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:56:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA20224
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0vi2EU-00030G-00; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:56:10 -0700
To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Year 2000 time change(Format support) 
Cc: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl (Wilko Bulte), hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jan 1997 21:22:29 +1100."
		<199701081022.CAA25400@freefall.freebsd.org> 
References: <199701081022.CAA25400@freefall.freebsd.org>  
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 10:56:10 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0vi2EU-00030G-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199701081022.CAA25400@freefall.freebsd.org> Darren Reed writes:
: Are there any cases where software calculates a year that is in the range
: 0-99 and then adds that to 1900 ?

There are many places where years are displayed as tm_yr + 1900, but
that is the right thing to do (since tm_yr isn't in the range 0..99).

: Or any that displays 19%d ?

Likely.  I keep seeing such things.  A quick grep of the source tree
will tell the anser to that :-).

Warner