Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:22:53 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst <csxbcs@comp.leeds.ac.uk> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: dan@langille.org, FreeBSD Current Users <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Patch to fix "make buildkernel requires full obj directory" mistake Message-ID: <20010124122253.B1491@comp.leeds.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200101222339.f0MNdu913510@harmony.village.org> References: <200101220910.WAA24873@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> <20010118101315.A10537@rapier.smartspace.co.za> <200101220910.WAA24873@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> <200101222339.f0MNdu913510@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote: > In message <200101220910.WAA24873@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> "Dan Langille" writes: > : http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > This change should do the trick if I'm reading things right. It's still KERNEL= in -stable though I think. I think I'll just add a <note> which says "in -current use KERNCONF instead of KERNEL". When -stable uses KERNCONF too this ugliness can go. In fact, I just have committed this. -- Ben Smithurst / csxbcs@comp.leeds.ac.uk / ben@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010124122253.B1491>