From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Oct 23 13:50: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E13937B479 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id NAA72868; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010232050.NAA72868@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Todd P. Whitesel" Subject: Re: i386/22240: unstable UDMA on Iwill VD133PL v1.6 (Apollo MVP3, IDE rev 0x10) Reply-To: "Todd P. Whitesel" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR i386/22240; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Todd P. Whitesel" To: sos@freebsd.dk (Soren Schmidt) Cc: toddpw@apricot.com, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i386/22240: unstable UDMA on Iwill VD133PL v1.6 (Apollo MVP3, IDE rev 0x10) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:48:33 -0700 (PDT) > Are you using a prober ATA66 compliant cable ? It's the one Iwill supplies with the motherboard, and looks right. Symptoms were the same when I replaced the UDMA66 drive with a UDMA33 drive. > At any rate I have the same VIA chip (82c686) on two boards here, and I have > absolutely _no_ problems with them, however you say it should be a 82c586 Just reporting what dmesg said, nothing more than that. > are you sure of that ? (check the mothernboard itself), as this could be > a screwup in versioning of the VIA chips (they have a weird idea of how > to differentiate the different chips)... That would appear to be the case. VT82C686A 0025CG TAIWAN 13C0N7100 -- Todd Whitesel Anime Expo Information at toddpw @ apricot.com http://www.anime-expo.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message