Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:57:19 +0300 From: Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.2 port (java/eclipse32) Message-ID: <20061009135719.GA56224@office.redwerk.com> In-Reply-To: <273C02EB81D51F8607AEB1A4@rambutan.pingpong.net> References: <768690DD58883C4FAA0C089A534F94DF2054DE@intexch02.int.appriss.com> <54A56D47DC749F45C4291FD0@rambutan.pingpong.net> <452286C2.3030902@appriss.com> <273C02EB81D51F8607AEB1A4@rambutan.pingpong.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Working on the build for 3.2.1 now. Hoping to have it done by the end of > >the day. We talked about updating the the old port on this mailing list > >and more people seemed to want it to be a separate port so we did not > >break the dependencies. I am getting more and more emails now supporting > >to update the existing eclipse port. I have no problem with that. I will > >ask again how many people would prefer updating the original eclipse port > >versus creating a new port? Please comment on this ASAP as I am working > >on an update to eclipse 3.2.1. I prefer to have port of Eclipse 3.1 be updated rather than get separate Eclipse 3.2 port. -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061009135719.GA56224>