From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar  2 02:44:55 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3AF16A400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Mar 2007 02:44:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from meenoo@gmail.com)
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F29413C481
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Mar 2007 02:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from meenoo@gmail.com)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so529977ugh
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:44:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=BKPQzY3XDSLRnPzhOWZv94EBOAp3jZv+hAKhk0XoDmN0T6QigVZXFB4WuTH4yb10hZ5rqzM8L+fjfK3Fd7iGAm/Xf71lisrVLoXSK1Xme/I7fN9MLJa65RJYMPBofXrhNUn+LW/dWtkrT/z4J9zsIE11/Z1hiM+H7UW3BBxyb5k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=XOJ0OBEmdcZviWDP3aCtiGrj0LXWJtc6zeg7477C25Gtzgsv8zl8TeDeze8xwV11ze4+smMvA0lp32eD7lxy9aZMr9TbuEjkyNLYhX0z9MgdT2L5pcAlMKOOtKL0Tq2ha56GDb7tP/Rg1LPjEE9UlJBdjV2sLN/YM/cPZjV42N0=
Received: by 10.114.12.9 with SMTP id 9mr55081wal.1172801939374;
	Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.156.17 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b5e09e920703011818i2bde9a5n8348aa05c996f5d1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:18:59 -0500
From: "Meenoo Shivdasani" <meenoo@gmail.com>
To: dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au
In-Reply-To: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <003701c75a03$fb478ac0$d801a8c0@dimuthu>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:44:55 -0000

On 2/26/07, Dimuthu Parussalla <dparussalla@baysidegrp.com.au> wrote:
> Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2
>
> Still under load clamav_90_2 locks up with high cpu usage. Had to downgrade
> the port to 88.7_1 to get the server going. Sockstat shows lots of open
> sockets from clamd.

I've been seeing excessive CPU usage from clamav_90_1 on 6.1.  (clamd
taking 60+% of the CPU)  I've somewhat stifled that by reducing the #
of postfix connections to clam and by implementing other postfix
things to reduce the ability of botnet infested hosts to be able to
get to clam in the first place.

FWIW, I didn't see this problem with earlier versions of clam.

M