From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 10 18:48: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAE837B71A; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 18:48:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2B2lCH65870; Sat, 10 Mar 2001 18:47:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall option for softupdates In-Reply-To: <20010310154352.C18227@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20010310041951.G62392@targetnet.com> <20010310115154M.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010310154352.C18227@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010310184712H.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 18:47:12 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 11 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: "David O'Brien" Subject: Re: sysinstall option for softupdates Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 15:43:52 -0800 > Why not add the softupdates option to newfs? Since newfs contains every > tunefs option other than softupdates, I consider it a bug that newfs > didn't gain that functionality when it was added to tunefs. I've no objection, but that's a bigger bikeshed. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message