From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Dec 16 03:40:24 1996
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA20380
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id DAA20371
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA04308; Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:40:18 -0800 (PST)
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Mesa-2.0 pkgname? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 15 Dec 1996 18:24:10 PST."
             <96Dec15.182413pst.177711@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> 
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 03:40:17 -0800
Message-ID: <4305.850736417@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I think you're right.  If someone else hasn't already changed it yet,
please feel free.

> Does Mesa-2.0 really want to have a pkgname of mesa-2.0?  Previous
> versions had pkgnames with capital M's, and the ports directory is
> ports/graphics/Mesa.  It's kind of confusing, IMHO.
> 
>   Bill