From owner-freebsd-smp  Sun Nov 26 18:39:27 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0C37B479
	for <smp@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Nov 2000 18:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jlemon@localhost)
	by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eAR2c4R55543;
	Sun, 26 Nov 2000 20:38:04 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from jlemon)
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 20:38:04 -0600 (CST)
From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Message-Id: <200011270238.eAR2c4R55543@prism.flugsvamp.com>
To: jburkhol@home.com, smp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BSD/OS interrupt code 
X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-smp
In-Reply-To: <local.mail.freebsd-smp/20001127015006.5B7BDBA7A@io.yi.org>
References: <local.mail.freebsd-smp/grog@lemis.com>
Organization: 
Cc: 
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In article <local.mail.freebsd-smp/20001127015006.5B7BDBA7A@io.yi.org> you write:
>I also think that BSD/OS went a little too far with this, and
>have produced code that is very difficult to understand, let
>alone maintain.  I think its cool what they did, I'm humbled
>and amazed that they made it work, but I don't know that its
>right for FreeBSD.

Seconded.  This pretty much sums up my feeling too.
--
Jonathan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message