From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sun Mar  4 23:46:24 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71E4F3F9D1
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun,  4 Mar 2018 23:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru)
Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [84.52.119.162])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577AB77637
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Mar 2018 23:46:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru)
Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3132D14997;
 Sun,  4 Mar 2018 20:06:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: poudriere options: -c flag explanation
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Le_Baron_d=e2=80=99Merde?= <lebarondemerde@privacychain.ch>,
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <66224ba1-ccd8-9520-199c-5e4a5f4b4a44@abinet.ru>
 <20180303232601.ga4b6237ezqalcpu@privacychain.ch>
From: abi <abi@abinet.ru>
Message-ID: <acd96930-68a1-26e6-99d9-1c73e5037818@abinet.ru>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 23:06:47 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180303232601.ga4b6237ezqalcpu@privacychain.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim;
 t=1520194009;
 h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references;
 bh=IrVGW5GCeJzRobo9hdHYQD6zMw2dbTjKBmAOEulRJsY=;
 b=c6i/Hgu1Wwk9l10VLvu+OsVq9iCL/oFM6VP2zTlPDzwZPV3TE9LqTuluD4PuHdS3T3ynK6
 IeBGMCVQyaLRd7HE5hMPUV5TLu7oFRt/GKEuFtwbderkEUnNE9CCwuBrSEK+fs1Y5PHF8H
 680BlnUtbeC+3t5hhq+/tn1bAid+g2Y=
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 23:46:24 -0000

On 04.03.2018 02:26, Le Baron d’Merde wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 01:02:23PM +0300, abi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Assuming that -n flag suggests that options run recursivly for deps chain,
>> isn't  -c flag should always invoke dialog4ports for every port with options ?
>>
>> For example, poudriere options -c editors/libreoffice asks for options
>> through all dep chain if runs the first time, on subsequent run it asks for
>> options only for original port or if it find no cached options.
>>
>> This looks confusing, is it intended?
> The default behavior of ports-mgmt/poudriere is to open the dialog to set OPTIONS
> for each selected port (targets) and all its dependencies, unless they were
> already set.
>
> Issuing 'poudriere options -n' will just open the dialog to the target(s) and not its
> dependencies. Again, but for those which already have OPTIONS set.
>
> The -c flag in 'poudriere options' delete the previous selected options to the
> specified target(s) and open the dialog to set them again - what may include
> dependencies without OPTINOS set already.
>
Isn't this behaviour incorrect? If -c skips dependencies with OPTIONS, 
it is impossible to revisit them? For example, if I want to re-think all 
dependencies of java and check their options, how can I do this? Man 
suggests that -c behaviour is recursive (if -n is not provided).