From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 29 18:34:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2702316A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:34:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.50.15])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7BA43D3F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:34:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from dhcp-11.local ([172.16.0.11] helo=localhost)
	by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1BfNQL-000KMD-9s; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:34:01 +0200
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 20:33:56 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
To: Hye-Shik Chang <perky@i18n.org>
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040629173652.GA87968@i18n.org>
Message-Id: <E121B56C-C9FA-11D8-9FE1-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: A question about dependencies
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:34:12 -0000

Hye-Shik Chang wrote:

> Aah, Right. How about this, then?:
>
> [...]

Looks good to me. An unrelated comment, but since we are at it: How 
about testing ${PYTHON_NO_DEPENDS:U} instead of ${PYTHON_NO_DEPENDS}, 
and erroring out when it's not "NO" or "YES" (e.g. "TRUE")?

-Oliver