Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:57:28 +0000 From: Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/18104: missing include file in sh(1) Message-ID: <20000420135728.A4712@happy.checkpoint.com> In-Reply-To: <20000420123550.B14798@cons.org>; from cracauer@cons.org on Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:35:51PM %2B0200 References: <200004200400.VAA88954@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000420120542.B14071@cons.org> <20000420131840.A1964@happy.checkpoint.com> <20000420123550.B14798@cons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:35:51PM +0200, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > The difference is that mine does not have -static. > > If you build from /usr/src to /usr/obj, you get -static, if you build > outside, you don't :-( > > Suboptimal control mechanism, I'd say. It is also questionable why > the -static case tries to resolve symbols that are already defined in > primary object files in the static libraries as well. I'd say it's fair to presume the linker just treats static libraries as big lumps of statis object files and heaps them together with primary object files. Anyway, the problem does exist. At least for people who want their shells static, thank-you-very-much ;) Maybe we should just rename the trace function and be done with it? -- Anatoly Vorobey, mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000420135728.A4712>