From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 17 17:43:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA75E106576D; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD718FC1E; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8HHhL6L007809; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:43:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Alexey Dokuchaev Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:04:07 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200809151036.19674.jhb@freebsd.org> <48D0A92F.8010609@FreeBSD.org> <20080917074414.GA4703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080917074414.GA4703@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809171304.08204.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:43:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.1/8270/Wed Sep 17 09:15:56 2008 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.2 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton , Alex Dupre Subject: Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:43:56 -0000 On Wednesday 17 September 2008 03:44:14 am Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:52:31AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > > Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > >Nevertheless, going back to rev. 1.559 of b.p.m. restores correct > > >behavior. > > > > Are you sure? I didn't try, but that commit seems to add new reasons to > > show up the dialog box while not removing any of the old ones. > > Running "make config-recursive" still works (and it calls recursively > > "make config-conditional" that works), so it seems john's analysis is > > correct, but I cannot figure how (and if) ever worked before. > > Perhaps I was too fast in my response; I cannot reproduce it now. While > I'm trying to continuously approach revision that used to work, I'm > starting to suspect that what if it never actually worked? > > John, how old was your ports tree on 6.x? Maybe this can shed some light > on the subject.. I had updated it the day before my e-mail. When I noticed that ports weren't popping up config screens, I actually stopped my build of ports/x11/kde4 at one point and did a 'make config-recursive' from that port and encountered several config screens (libxine, qt4-gui, etc.) -- John Baldwin