From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 23:20:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8AB16A421 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from smtp8.server.rpi.edu (smtp8.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB5E13C484 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp8.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l5KNKrJ9018945; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:20:53 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20070620004439.GC13241@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20070620004439.GC13241@cdnetworks.co.kr> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:20:52 -0400 To: pyunyh@gmail.com From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam scanning disabled X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.228 Cc: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic due to 'ds_len > SBP_SEG_MAX' X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:20:55 -0000 At 9:44 AM +0900 6/20/07, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: >On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 04:51:20PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > > This past Sunday I updated my 7.x source tree and compiled everything. > > When I tried to boot up with the new kernel, I hit a panic: > > > > trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s9 > > panic: ds_len > SBP_SEG_MAX, fix busdma code > > KDB: enter: panic > > > > At the time I was already running late for something else, so I > > just rebooted into the old kernel and went back to running that. > > > > Has anyone else seen this? >I have no experience with sbp(4) but I guess _bus_dmamap_loader_buffer >didn't honor specified DMA tag. >How about attached one? I did a quick test of this change, but I still get the panic. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu