Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 18:04:21 +0000 From: jbo@insane.engineer To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernape@freebsd.org>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Build issue with i386 port Message-ID: <9ZQ1RgjxwamYo_YNKUEfd5Aq7X9m6pUgRdbyxcj71_qRzdufKX8g9V-Xe8jsCn8b6Uo3jvVA3IwtJeYm7N4A6i35MqBI5PrVBuf_rKxjd60=@insane.engineer> In-Reply-To: <168EF37D-8591-4F8C-93E1-F15FDA10F311@FreeBSD.org> References: <HHY42GcIqbl9KVSvHSzg73YO7HcDnD_PD4r9wDzBtyH0RPJcBXGdsfdwCYDixZRJRjN3qktWgORg2apUdq9YeGycdg1lLHZcyZ6PTIXTuQY=@insane.engineer> <zfL6oy-z-MOKJcsJTWbT4bXx4TCQCLUWVzLxT3DgK6tpyDutGVNFjovLSBm78Q-sDQ0lz8tx4IyODhzrDhSPRR3wXpQJ9yk-7xlDu8wiW6w=@insane.engineer> <CAGwOe2a=oNCK8jryHMhD11OQHnAw3C34M18aVFF8tSHubYxyGQ@mail.gmail.com> <168EF37D-8591-4F8C-93E1-F15FDA10F311@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oooh! This is so obvious it almost hurts... So basically what happened is that upstream's v1.00 release that the port i= s building didn't yet support i386. Meanwhile, I was able to compile successfully on my VMs because I was using the main/master branch which doe= s support i386. I hope we can just consider this a beginner's mistake :p This brings me to the next question: According to Repology [1], a lot of pa= ckages are using the v1.01 tag whereas our port is currently using v1.00. The reason I didn't update the port yet is because there isn't= an official release on the upstream's GitHub page. What is the recommended/preferred way of handling this? [1] https://repology.org/project/cpufetch/versions Best regards, ~ Joel ------- Original Message ------- On Monday, April 11th, 2022 at 19:57, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrot= e: > > > On 11 Apr 2022, at 19:53, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa fernape@freebsd.org wr= ote: > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 7:24 PM jbo@insane.engineer wrote: > > ... > > > > gmake[1]: Entering directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/sysutils/cpufetch/wo= rk/cpufetch-1.00' > > > Makefile:38: Unsupported arch detected: i386. See https://github.com/= Dr-Noob/cpufetch#1-support > > > Makefile:39: If your architecture is supported but the compilation fa= ils, please open an issue in https://github.com/Dr-Noob/cpufetch/issues > > > Makefile:40: *** Aborting compilation. Stop. > > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/sysutils/cpufetch/wor= k/cpufetch-1.00' > > > =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > > > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the fa= ilure to > > > the maintainer. > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Upstream's Makefile uses $(shell uname -m) to determine the architect= ure [2]. My VMs are successfully reporting this as > > > i386 which upstream's Makefile appears to support explicitly. After a= ll, I'm also able to build this software > > > on those VMs if just cloning & running gmake manually. > > > > > > I'm not really sure where to go from here. As I can build the softwar= e in FreeBSD i386 VMs I think > > > that the issue is related to my port and not upstream. But then again= , the build fails "within" upstream's Makefile. > > > > > > Could somebody help me out here? > > > > When the Makefile checks the output of uname -m, it compares the > > result with a list of values that includes i686 but not i386. > > I think a simple REINPLACE_CMD would suffice here. > > > > Since I failed to detect this, do you want me to fix it in the repo? I > > will also send a patch upstream. > > > No need :) > https://github.com/Dr-Noob/cpufetch/commit/0db9f1f5c26e57a6383f4609c5605e= d5d3d41fd1 > > -Dimitry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9ZQ1RgjxwamYo_YNKUEfd5Aq7X9m6pUgRdbyxcj71_qRzdufKX8g9V-Xe8jsCn8b6Uo3jvVA3IwtJeYm7N4A6i35MqBI5PrVBuf_rKxjd60=>