From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 21 19:04:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA12531 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:04:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phobos.illtel.denver.co.us (phobos.illtel.denver.co.us [207.33.75.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA12523 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:04:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us) Received: from localhost (abelits@localhost) by phobos.illtel.denver.co.us (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA20641; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:03:11 -0700 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:03:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Belits To: Terry Lambert cc: jlemon@americantv.com, jooji@webnology.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Producing non-GPLed tools for FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199810220141.SAA12492@usr01.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > So you could argue that the GPL is just another form of an NDA. > > > > I don't want to know, what do you smoke, but please, explain, what kind > > of disclosure of the GPL'ed source is prohibited by GPL? > > Disclosure of binaries without source code. 8-). *Lack* of disclosure of the source code with binaries disclosure is prohibited, not the disclosure itself. Just lack of attribution in the case of BSD license. -- Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message