From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Mar 8 08:40:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1EDAC19DC for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rumpelsepp@sevenbyte.org) Received: from mail.sevenbyte.org (mail.sevenbyte.org [5.9.90.188]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC68418 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rumpelsepp@sevenbyte.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sevenbyte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AC41260715 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:22:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sevenbyte.org Received: from mail.sevenbyte.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sevenbyte.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aN0e0-fgwTtF for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:22:42 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Implementing KDBus with Capsicum integration in FreeBSD To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: From: Stefan Tatschner Message-ID: <56DE8BD2.4060301@sevenbyte.org> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:22:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 08:40:17 -0000 On 08.03.2016 09:04, pavan teja wrote: > Hello everyone, > Express your view about adding capabilities sharing > among processes by implementing something similar to KDBUS in FreeBSD . > Sicne KDBUS supports most of the data structures in Linux adding > capabilities to share among processes by using capsicum .Please let me know > what you feel . kdbus is unmaintained and the developers stepped back to the drawing board. AFAIK kdbus is being reworked and redesigned; [1, 2] Stefan [1]: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=KDBUS-Back-To-Design [2]: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=BUS1-In-Development