From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Oct 1 10:57:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F1115A9B; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:57:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA44195; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:57:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) Message-Id: <199910011757.NAA44195@misha.cisco.com> Subject: Re: bin/14066: use of ssh2 as CVS_RSH breaks commiting In-Reply-To: from Bill Fumerola at "Oct 1, 1999 12:45:12 pm" To: Bill Fumerola Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:57:11 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Mikhail Teterin , Ruslan Ermilov , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com From: Mikhail Teterin X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bill Fumerola once wrote: > > Why don't you just say, that PRs without patches are NOT > > accepted? And spare the discussions? This problem involves part > > of the FreeBSD (/usr/bin/cvs) interacting with the FreeBSD port > > (/usr/ports/security/ssh2). Yet, FreeBSD team refuses to aknowledge > > the problem has anything to do with FreeBSD -- the PR was closed the > > next day without much investigation. > > I like this better: > > CVS is vendor imported software that we didn't write nor do we > maintain. SSH is a port that not only didn't we write: we don't even > update or include it as part of the base system. And the fact, they don't work together on FreeBSD does not bother us much. Right? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message