From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 09:09:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4956916A4D0; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:09:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE4C43D1F; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:09:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1MH95OJ091168; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:09:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i1MH93bK091167; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:09:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:09:03 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20040222170903.GA91129@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <87u11p8sl6.fsf@gray.impulse.net> <20040222055417.GA3941@dragon.nuxi.com> <1077429634.98580.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20040222074403.GB33450@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040222074403.GB33450@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Ted Cabeen cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:09:15 -0000 On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:44:03AM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Feb 22), Joe Marcus Clarke said: > > On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 00:54, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > > > > WHY in the world is there even a /usr/local/etc/rc.subr ??? > > > /etc/rc.subr on 5-CURRENT is perfectly fine. > > > > It was needed for a short time to workaround a package problem on > > bento. As of the last round of bsd.*.mk changes, this is no longer the > > case. /etc/rc.subr is used where it exists. > > Also needed for 4.x systems. Please read "on 5-CURRENT". It was a pruely 5-CURRENT statement.