From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 14:14:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6E6106564A; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296598FC15; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p57B3AEEE.dip.t-dialin.net [87.179.174.238]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CE34844012; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:14:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.2.110]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85272084; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:14:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:14:42 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20110212151442.000016bb@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <20110211103028.12684f54yrw8tgqo@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 7CE34844012.A5BC2 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.4, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, J_CHICKENPOX_73 0.60) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1298124889.73498@AIz5j75uNge7x9S3g7G5pQ X-EBL-Spam-Status: No X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:08:15 +0000 Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, kibab@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFR: FEATURE macros for AUDIT/CAM/IPC/KTR/MAC/NFS/NTP/PMC/SYSV/... X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:14:53 -0000 On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:52:48 +0000 (GMT) Robert Watson wrote: > The one comment I'd make is that the MAC case should indicate that > "The MAC Framework" is supported, rather than mandatory access > controls being present -- the presence of the framework doesn't imply > the presence of mandatory access control policies. Does FEATURE(mac, "Mandatory Access Control Framework support"); look better? Alternatively/additionally we could use mac_framework as the name of the feature. Bye, Alexander.