Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:25:01 +0700 From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: "Mr. Darren" <darren780@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /dev/acd0c bug Message-ID: <20020627142500.A50137@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020627004553.11528.qmail@web20601.mail.yahoo.com>; from darren780@yahoo.com on Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:45:53PM -0700 References: <20020626180709.B7817@iclub.nsu.ru> <20020627004553.11528.qmail@web20601.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:45:53PM -0700, Mr. Darren wrote: > I make bchunk not determin the track mode on purpose, > if it see's mode 1.. it assumes it's a certain size > and I loose about 100 megs of data off the cd, however > if I change mode1 to another word... it extracts the > image properly... why do you think it will "loose" 100 megs? yes, the resulting .iso tracks are smaller than .bin tracks but it is ok because actual data size for MODE1/MODE2 sector is 2048 bytes. the rest (2352 - 2048 = 304 bytes) is ECC data which is not stored in .iso files > IT WILL NOT EXTRACT THE FOLLOWING PROPERLY: > ======================================== > FILE "ctp-en1.bin" BINARY > TRACK 01 MODE2/2352 > INDEX 01 00:00:00 > TRACK 02 MODE2/2352 > INDEX 01 00:06:00 > ======================================== > IT WILL EXTRACT THE FOLLOWING PROPERLY > ======================================== > FILE "ctp-en1.bin" BINARY > TRACK 01 OTMODE2/2352 > INDEX 01 00:00:00 > TRACK 02 OTMODE2/2352 > INDEX 01 00:06:00 are you sure that you have mode2 tracks? I suggest you to try MODE1/2352 or MODE2/2352 and check the resulting .iso tracks with vnconfig and mount -t cd9660 /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020627142500.A50137>