From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 17:37:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3611916A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:37:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43AC43D2D; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 17:37:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j39Hb6EK023090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j39Hb6uY023089; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <200504091737.j39Hb6uY023089@aldan.algebra.com> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w y+z3/UR{6SCQ X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org cc: voisine@gmail.com Subject: linux- ports on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 17:37:10 -0000 Hello! linux_base-8 installed without a hitch, but linux-gtk2 and its dependencies kept complaining about amd64. I had to patch them all with -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 +ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 and rename distinfo.i386 back into distinfo for the time being. linux-jpeg was a special case, requiring the following patch: -RPM_SET= libjpeg-6b-15.${MACHINE_ARCH}.rpm +RPM_SET= libjpeg-6b-15.${MACHINE_ARCH:S/amd64/i386/}.rpm As a result linux-firefox installed and is usable. Is this problem just an oversight or was there a conscientious decision to limit these ports to i386, when amd64 is also perfectly capable to use them? -mi