Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 09:55:23 +0200 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/135484: port lang/python and python26 build failed Message-ID: <20090702075523.GA2219@sorry.mine.nu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Synopsis: port lang/python and python26 build failed > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: lwhsu > State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 30 16:13:43 UTC 2009 > State-Changed-Why: > I cannot reproduce here. Could you update your ports tree and try > again. If it still fails, please list your /etc/make.conf and the > installed packages.l > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135484 hmm, I tried the build a view times after reporting and always it doesn't build the package in lang/python (with or without this line #PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION?= python2.6 in etc/make.conf) Test case was always to deinstall all ports that use python and make sure there is nothing left like /usr/local/lib/python*. Then delete directories lang/python lang/python2(5|6) remove the line in ports/.portsnap.INDEX fetch and update. I don't know what happened but port python26 could build at a given time where lang/python does noting except extract with the following command $> make package DEPENDS_TARGET=package clean One thing I remember a day after report the port lang/python tried to build python25 instead python26. It even hasn't work after removing this lines in make.conf WRKDIRPREFIX?= /build/work DISTDIR?= /data/distfiles PACKAGES?= /data/packages After your feedback I tried today building package with both ports and it works as expected for both. A side note: most of the ports use PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} except the following they use PKGNAMEPREFIX= py- py-libmpdclient-0.10.0 py-MySQL-1.4 py-SQLDict-1.0.0 py-Ice-3.3.1 py-kqueue-1.4_2 py-subversion-1.6.3 py-tconfpy-2.112 py-thrift-20070917 py-gnuplot-1.8 py-mp-random-1.0_4 py-punjab-0.12 py-HyperText-1.0.1 py-gnome-1.4.4_9 py-gtk-0.6.11_6 py-gtkscintilla-0.8.2_6 Maybe it is a good idea to make this consistent? For me the port is working now, please close the PR Regards, olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090702075523.GA2219>